I don't speak Russian, so I write this post in English.

After I read the New Chronology explanation for the Book of Daniel Ester and protestantism I make the hypothesis that the Council of Trent and the Counter-Reformation really happened in Russia and then its events and documents were artificially moved to Italy to make the faithfuls loyal to the empire to believe that the Italian centered Roman empire was always the object of their loyalty.

My theory is also that the book of Maccabi is about the counter reformation. I don't know if a new chronologist has already taken this position, and I like to make my point.

Soon after the Council of Trent Scaligerian history locate this document:

http://www.dailycatholic.org/cumexapo.htm

Here you have a quote:

"We have been concerned also lest it may befall Us to see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by the prophet Daniel, in the holy place."

The Pope here is stating he is acting to prevent a threat explained by Daniel.

In a new chronology perspective this suggest that the Pope is probably a contemporary of Daniel.

If you read the whole document you can see that it is all about explaining that a heretic cannot hold any jurisdiction and the people must disobey him even if he seems to be the Roman Pontiff. The author is clearly worried that a successor of him or an emperor could be a heretic soon.

Scaligerian historians have a stupid explanation for that, but I am honestly too lazy to give it, you now what the the New Chronology explanation instead is, the Pope is fearing that what happened because of Esther could happen again soon.

But what is the abomination of desolation?

The Bull became more famous after Vatican II council because some catholics, now known as sedevacantists, believed that the case in point realized in Vatican II hence the Roman church lost its head. Some of them also believe that the Novus Ordo Missae is the abomination of desolation. Here is why:

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/abomination-of-desolation-machabees/

Here is a quote: "Now, if as part of a new cult and worship form you erect a “table” (read 2nd altar) between the vertical edge of the original altar and the altar rail, for the 1st and only time in Catholic history, you will have replicated the abomination of desolation in the Machabees; for the Table in the Novus Ordo is directly “upon” (1 Macc 1:57) the true Roman Rite altar because it sits on top of the horizontal plane of the altar, and “over against” (1 Macc 1:62) the true Roman Rite altar because the table stands in proximity to the vertical aspect of the altar."

According sedevacantists this prove Daniel was a visionary, because of the Scaligerian Chronology. But we should not forget that the abomination of desolation as described existed since a long time before Vatican II according to sedevacantists themselves

https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/new-mass-traditional-latin-mass/

"In Protestant England, for example, “On November 23, 1550 the Privy Council ordered all altars in England destroyed and replaced by communion tables.”<11>

The chief Protestant heretics declared: “The form of a table shall more move the simple from the superstitious opinions of the popish Mass unto the right use of the Lord’s Supper. For the use of an altar is to make sacrifice upon it: the use of a table is to serve men to eat upon.”<12> The Welsh Catholic martyr, Richard Gwyn, declared in protest against this change: “In place of an altar there is a miserable table, in place of Christ there is bread.”<13>

And St. Robert Bellarmine noted: “…when we enter the temples of the heretics, where there is nothing except a chair for preaching and a table for making a meal, we feel ourselves to be entering a profane hall and not the house of God.”<14>

Just like the new services of the Protestant revolutionaries, the New Mass is celebrated on a table."

In a New Chronology perspective, Daniel was simply a eye witness of the abomination of desolation under this description.

The obvious consequence should be that the counter reformation is described in the book of maccabees.

It is worth noting as a side note that a document of the Council of Costance, Haec Sancta if i am right, is clearly a ghost of this document.