How does Fomenko explain the shifts of language through time? Just by examining the structure of the English language would be enough to debunk his theories of "everything" starting around year 1000. Does Fomenko touch the linguistics/history of languages, namely Indo-European? ------
"Not only Italian, but all the national literary languages in Western Europe began to form in the 16th century. These include «correct» English enforced by Elizabeth I, the «New French» and «New Greek» languages, the «all German» language of Martin Luther’s Bible and so forth. There was no Spanish language – in Spain itself modern Spanich is still called Castellano.
Enforcement of Latin, and the national languages based on it was accompanied with the book auto-da-fe: the Inquisition sent all «suspicious» books into the fire. (The same did Russian Orthodox Church even in the end of the 18th century.)" (Fomenko) ------
So, what to say about linguistics/history of languages in the whole Europe in the Новая хронология?
При использовании материалов форума ссылка на источник обязательна.
Участники форума вправе высказывать любую точку зрения, не противоречащую законодательству РФ, этическим нормам и правилам форума.
Администрация форума не несет ответственность за достоверность фактов и обоснованность высказываний.
